Alerts for the Journal

Click to get an email alert for every new issue of

Operative Dentistry

Journal Information

Online ISSN: 1559-2863
Print ISSN: 0361-7734
Frequency: Bimonthly

Register for a Profile

Not Yet Registered?

Benefits of Registration Include:
  • A Unique User Profile that will allow you to manage your current subscriptions (including online access)

  • The ability to create favorites lists down to the article level

  • The ability to customize email alerts to receive specific notifications about the topics you care most about and special offers

    Register Now!

rrs icon (What is this?)

Previous Article Next Article

Incremental Layer Shear Bond Strength of Low-shrinkage Resin Composites Under Different Bonding Conditions

AH Al MusaHNA Al Nahedh

Arwa H. Al Musa, BDS, MSD, King Saud University, Restorative Dental Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

*Hend N. A, Al Nahedh, BDS, MSD, King Saud University, Restorative Dental Sciences. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

*Corresponding author: PO Box 60169, Riyadh, 11545, Saudi Arabia; e-mail:
Clinical Relevance

The chemical compatibility between old and repair composite resins and the use of an appropriate bonding agent are crucial for high incremental bond strength. A silorane-based resin composite should be repaired with a silorane-based composite and silorane adhesive material.

SUMMARY

The purpose of this study was to determine the incremental shear bond strength of a silorane-based composite (Filtek Silorane) repaired with silorane or a methacrylate-based composite (Filtek Z250) under various aging conditions. Also, the incremental bond strength of the silorane-based composite was compared with that of another low-shrinkage methacrylate-based composite (Aelite LS Posterior) under fresh and aged conditions, with and without the use of an adhesive resin between successive layers. The two brands of low-shrinkage composites were compared with a microhybrid, Filtek Z250, which served as the control. Substrate discs were fabricated and second layers were adhered to them immediately, after two weeks of aging, or after four weeks of aging and with and without an adhesive resin. Shear bond strengths were measured and failure modes were evaluated. The incremental bond strength of silorane to the silorane-based composite was not significantly different from that of the methacrylate-based composite. However, repairing a silorane-based composite with a methacrylate-based composite significantly reduced the bond strength. Aelite showed a lower incremental bond strength than Z250 and silorane, but the use of an adhesive significantly improved the bond strength. The absence of an oxygen-inhibited layer did not affect the bond strength of the consecutive layers of the silorane-based composite.

Accepted: December 2, 2013;

Operative Dentistry, Inc.